I can understand that. Byron was a brilliant, exciting, manic sort of hero. At the end of the day, though, I'm probably more Elinor Dashwood than Contessa Guiccioli. (*yawn*, lol)
Where as, Jane Austen, would be more than acceptable as a guest, but her books where originally published Anon, there for her celebrities never had a effect in life.
But it said, that even Prince Regent George the IV was a fan of the books.
Yes, well, smashing profile notwithstanding, he was a VERY naughty man. :P
Lord Byron was far more commonly present in forms of whispers of gossip in Drawing rooms than a guest.
I can understand that.
Byron was a brilliant, exciting, manic sort of hero. At the end of the day, though, I'm probably more Elinor Dashwood than Contessa Guiccioli. (*yawn*, lol)
Where as, Jane Austen, would be more than acceptable as a guest, but her books where originally published Anon, there for her celebrities never had a effect in life.
But it said, that even Prince Regent George the IV was a fan of the books.
Yes, I can imagine if I had Byron as a guest I'd have to lock up ALL attractive young family members...