For a while I have been asking myself the same question: What is the purpose of an event schedule if it is not taken seriously.
In my opinion the ning event schedule is a very practical tool to coodrinate events in the historical communities and gives us a chance to act as a community in a transparent way for our members. For me the worst case would be if people had to choose between 3 events that take place simultaneously. I am not against competition but is that not slightly unfair?
In the past we have been able to enjoy so many lovely and thrilling events at different places - we tend to forget that there is a process of conception and realisation behind each event. So much work and efforts are put into this to make a wonderful experience possible. And I also speak from my own experience. The more annoying it gets when someone plans an event at the same time on the same day though the schedule is visible for everyone.
I am now wondering how seriously the schedule should be taken? I think it should be taken pretty seriously considering the amount of work that goes into every event. I personally try to plan events in advance so they do not collide with events in the coeurs or whever. For instance I moved the Patrons Ball roughly two times so it would not interfer with some interesting I might also want to attend myself!
I remember Tatiana's words a while ago about the photos display: Everyone should be given the opportunity to stand out. That is what I call fair and peaceful coexistence. Should the same not count for the event schedule?
updated by @anne-comtesse-de-noailles: 18 Oct 2016 08:39:27PM